Cases 71 - 80 of 587
Granval Hunter-Harrison , Jr. v. M. Atchley
as 22-17029
Petitioner / Appellant:
GRANVAL G. HUNTER-HARRISON, Jr.
Respondent / Appellee:
M. ATCHLEY, Warden
Chapelle-Harrison v. Secretary, Department of Corrections
as 6:2022cv02268
Petitioner:
Devonte Donnell Chapelle-Harrison
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 22-20645
Petitioner / Appellant:
Daniel Lee Harrison
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Matthew Harrison v. Raphael Washington
as 22-2106
Petitioner / Appellant:
MATTHEW THOMAS HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
RAPHAEL WASHINGTON
Harris v. Langley
as 3:2022cv00188
Petitioner:
Charles Harris
Respondent:
Sheriff Terry Langley, LT Henderson, Carroll County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Chardez Harrison v. Dan Cromwell
as 22-3026
Petitioner / Appellant:
CHARDEZ HARRISON
Respondent / Appellee:
DAN CROMWELL
Harrison v. Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
as 5:2022cv00501
Petitioner:
Jermaine Lavan Harrison
Respondent:
Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Harrison v. Goodwin
as 2:2022cv04322
Plaintiff:
Eddie Harrison, III
Defendant:
Jerry Goodwin
Respondent:
Attorney General State of Louisiana
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harrison v. Lumpkin
as 4:2022cv03589
Petitioner:
Wendell Harrison
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Guthrie v. Dodson et al
as 1:2022cv00282
Plaintiff:
Curtis Mark Guthrie
Defendant:
Lisa Dodson, Harrison County, Mississippi, Mississippi Department of Corrections and others
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
