Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Singh v. Barr et al
as 1:2020cv00567
Defendant:
Scott Hassell, Secretary of Homeland Security, Matthew Whitaker and others
Plaintiff:
Surjit Singh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
De La Rosa Espinoza v. Guadian et al
as 5:2020cv03126
Respondent:
Chad Wolf, Robert Guadian, Larry Sigler and others
Petitioner:
Yusnier De La Rosa Espinoza
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Watson v. Searls et al
as 1:2020cv00517
Defendant:
Jeffrey Searls, Thomas E. Feeley, Chad Wolf and others
Plaintiff:
Charles Watson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
ORJI v. BARR et al
as 1:2020cv01004
Respondent:
JOHN DOE, MARTHA DOE, CATRICIA HOWARD and others
Petitioner:
MICHAEL A. ORJI
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Reynoso v. Aviles
as 15-2700
Petitioner:
Eusebio Reynoso
Respondent:
Oscar Aviles, in his official capacity as Warden of Hudson County Jail, Christopher Shanahan, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Thomas Decker, in his official capacity as New York Field Office Director for U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement and others
MORRIS v. BARR
as 9:2020cv00454
Petitioner:
MIGUEL JUNIOR MORRIS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
MORRIS v. BARR
as 1:2020cv00814
Petitioner:
MIGUEL JUNIOR MORRIS
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CORNEJO v. EDWARDS et al
as 2:2020cv04580
Respondent:
Acting Secretary CHAD WOLF, THOMAS DECKER, RON EDWARDS and others
Petitioner:
Noe Cornejo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651
Betancourt Barco et al v. Price et al
as 2:2020cv00350
Defendant:
Chad Wolf, U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement, Matthew T. Albence and others
Plaintiff:
Rando Betancourt Barco, Michel Fuentes Luis and Luis Alfonso Mejia Velasquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
LARSEN v. BARR
as 1:2020cv00840
Petitioner:
GEORGE LARSEN
Respondent:
WILLIAM P. BARR
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
