Cases 1 - 10 of 1,859
Martinez-Rodriguez v. Lammer
as 3:2024cv50233
Petitioner:
Julian Martinez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden Brian Lammer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Luis Rodriguez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 24-11861
Petitioner:
LUIS ADAN RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
(HC) Rodriguez-Rodriguez v. Warden
as 1:2024cv00666
Petitioner:
Slyther J. Rodriguez-Rodriguez
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Rodriguez v. Ceja
as 1:2024cv01598
Petitioner:
Juan Carlos Rodriguez
Respondent:
D. Ceja
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Warden
as 3:2024cv00469
Petitioner:
Enedeo Rodriguez, Jr
Respondent:
Warden
Not Yet Classified:
INDIANA STATE PRISON E-FILE (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neri v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2024cv01378
Petitioner:
Jaime Rodriguez Neri
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Guadarama
as 3:2024cv00644
Petitioner:
Jesus Rodriguez
Respondent:
Jesus Guadarama
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Rodriguez v. Burke et al
as 1:2024cv02715
Petitioner:
Andres Rodriguez
Respondent:
James M. Burke, D. Goodman and Mark Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Lumpkin
as 1:2024cv00074
Petitioner:
Jorge Alberto Rodriguez
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ v. WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
as 1:2024cv06498
Petitioner:
SATURNINO DE JESUS-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent:
WARDEN, FCI FORT DIX
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
