General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
MOBLEY v. FLORES
as 6:2023cv01525
Petitioner: Richard J Mobley
Respondent: R Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
MOBLEY v. FLORES
as 5:2023cv00212
Petitioner: RICHARD J MOBLEY
Respondent: R FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
BAKER v. FLORES We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2023cv01948
Petitioner: ANTHONY BAKER
Respondent: R FLORES
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Ryan et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2017cv00278
Petitioner: Jorge R Flores
Respondent: Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 9:2014cv81490
Plaintiff: Carlos R. Flores
Defendant: Secretary, Florida Department of Corrections and Florida Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. McCabe et al
as 1:2012cv00170
Petitioner: Jose R Flores
Respondent: Warden McCabe and David L Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Flores v. McCabe et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 6:2011cv02773
Petitioner: Jose R Flores
Respondent: Warden McCabe and David L Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Flores v. Brown
as 2:2009cv01674
Petitioner: Mario R. Flores
Respondent: William Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Flores v. Quarterman
as 08-40694
Petitioner - Appellant: JOSE R FLORES, JR.
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Flores v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 1:2007cv20789
Petitioner: Cases R. Flores
Respondent: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?