Cases 1 - 10 of 30
Anguiano v. Jacquez
as 3:2024cv00113
Petitioner:
Rodolfo Anguiano, Jr.
Respondent:
Israel Jacquez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Anguiano v. Lumpkin
as 22-20488
Petitioner / Appellant:
Alaine Puente Anguiano
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Mario Anguiano Betancourt v. Glen E. Pratt
as 2:2022cv02811
Petitioner:
Mario Anguiano Betancourt
Respondent:
Warden Glen E. Pratt and Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Betancourt v. Pratt
as 2:2022cv02815
Petitioner:
Mario Anguiano Betancourt
Respondent:
Warden Glen E. Pratt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Anguiano v. Lumpkin
as 4:2021cv03436
Petitioner:
Alaine Puente Anguiano
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Alberto Anguiano v. Patricia Bradley et al
as 2:2020cv07615
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Respondent:
United States of America and Patricia Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alberto Anguiano v. United States of America et al
as 2:2020cv07080
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Respondent:
United States of America and Patricia Bradley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Alberto Anguiano v. United States of America
as 2:2020cv06195
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anguiano v. United States of America et al
as 4:2020cv00159
Respondent:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, United States of America and United States Marshal
Petitioner:
Alberto Anguiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Anguiano v. Neven et al
as 2:2019cv00406
Respondent:
Dwight Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Petitioner:
Jeanne Anguiano
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
