Cases 1 - 10 of 142
Johnson v. Harding
as 5:2024cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael D Johnson
Respondent:
Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2024cv00765
Petitioner:
Demetrius D. Johnson
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
George D. Johnson v. Warden
as 2:2024cv01975
Petitioner:
George D. Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Lubbock District Parole Office et al
as 5:2023cv00218
Petitioner:
Kenneth D Johnson, Sr
Respondent:
Lubbock District Parole Office and Shelby Silvas
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Johnson v. Eller
as 2:2023cv00021
Petitioner:
Charles D. Johnson
Respondent:
Bryan Eller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 3:2023cv00177
Petitioner:
Stafford D Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Carrillo v. Rosa et al
as 2:2023cv00269
Petitioner:
Octavio Carrillo
Respondent:
Luis Rosa, Jr, Dana Fishburn, Tae D. Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
(HC) Johnson v. San Joaquin Superior Court
as 2:2023cv00157
Petitioner:
Marcus D. Johnson
Respondent:
San Joaquin Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Palacios Alvarado v. Gillis et al
as 1:2022cv10082
Defendant:
SHAWN GILLIS, Secretary, USDHS ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, FILED OFFICE DIRECTO Kenneth Genalo and others
Plaintiff:
LUCAS LEONEL PALACIOS ALVARADO
Petitioner:
Lucas Palacios Alvarado
Respondent:
Alejandro Mayorkas, Kenneth Genalo and Tae Johnson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 fd Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
