Cases 1 - 10 of 56
Garcia v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00341
Petitioner:
Harry Garcia
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Buss et al
as 4:2024cv00077
Plaintiff:
Channen Ray Ozell Smith
Defendant:
David Buss, Getner Drummond and Randy Harding
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Walters v. Drummond
as 5:2024cv00179
Petitioner:
Winston Ray Walters
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRUMMOND v. HUTCHINSON
as 1:2024cv00015
Petitioner:
KEITH DRUMMOND
Respondent:
JANET HUTCHINSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Chiwanga v. Drummond
as 23-5136
Petitioner / Appellant:
JACKSON PETER CHIWANGA
Respondent / Appellee:
GENTNER F. DRUMMOND, Oklahoma Attorney General
Wright v. Quick
as 6:2023cv00385
Petitioner:
Jeremy Wright
Respondent:
Gentre Drummond and Christe Quick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Brewer v. Regalado et al
as 4:2023cv00483
Petitioner:
Renel Anthony Brewer
Respondent:
Victor Regalado, Eric Kitch and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Foy v. Drummond et al
as 4:2023cv00407
Petitioner:
Clint Patrick Foy
Respondent:
Gentner Drummond and Steven Kunzweiler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wanjiku v. Boggess
as 4:2023cv00363
Petitioner:
Erick Wanjiku
Respondent:
Gary Boggess and Gentner F Drummond
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
DRUMMOND v. KNIGHT et al
as 1:2023cv03683
Petitioner:
MARK LARANELL DRUMMOND
Respondent:
WARDEN STEVIE KNIGHT and FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
