Cases 1 - 10 of 12
Ruffin (PS) v. Flores
as 1:2023cv03183
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Ryan Flores
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin (PS) v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2023cv02025
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval and Attorney General of the State of Coloado, The
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00554
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00308
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval
as 1:2023cv00556
Petitioner:
David Antonio Ruffin
Respondent:
Stephanie Sandoval
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 st - Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Rodriguez v. Shinn et al
as 3:2023cv08005
Petitioner:
David Antonio Rodriguez
Respondent:
David Shinn, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Ryan Thornell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ruffin v. Sandoval et al
as 1:2022cv01673
Plaintiff:
David Antonio Ruffin
Defendant:
Sandoval and Phil Weiser
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
LEMUS v. MOSER
as 3:2021cv00058
Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, V. MOSER and BUREAU OF PRISONS
Petitioner:
DAVID ANTONIO LEMUS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
David Antonio Andrade Ruiz v. Neil McDawell
as 2:2019cv04862
Petitioner:
David Antonio Andrade-Ruiz
Respondent:
Neil McDawell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) Andrade-Ruiz v. McDawell
as 2:2019cv00967
Petitioner:
David Antonio Andrade-Ruiz
Respondent:
Neil McDawell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
