Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Lehmann v. Erie County Department of Social Services et al
as 1:2024cv00531
Respondent:
Kellie Poynton-Gallagher, Marie Cannon and Erie County Department of Social Services
Petitioner:
John Calvin Seth Lehmann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
John Buckley, IV v. Scott Jordan
as 23-5550
Petitioner / Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN BUCKLEY, IV
Respondent / Appellee:
SCOTT JORDAN, Warden
Buckley v. Mazza
as 5:2020cv00436
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Petitioner:
John Calvin Buckley, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Buckley v. Mazza
as 4:2020cv00177
Respondent:
Warden Kevin Mazza
Petitioner:
John Calvin Buckley, IV
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Everett v. United States of America
as 1:2014cv21630
Plaintiff:
John Calvin Everett
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
John Neuendorf, II v. Attorney General of the State, et al
as 14-15313
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN CALVIN NEUENDORF, II
Respondent - Appellee:
ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF ARIZONA, TERRY L. GODDARD and CHARLES L. RYAN
Neuendorf #147980 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2014cv00176
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Thomas C Horne
Petitioner:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Winrow v. Higgins et al
as 5:2013cv00546
Petitioner:
John Calvin Winrow, Jr
Respondent:
Haskell Higgins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Neuendorf v. Ryan et al
as 2:2012cv00755
Petitioner:
John Calvin Neuendorf, II
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan, Attorney General of the State of Arizona and Terry L Goddard
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lacey v. Cate
as 2:2011cv02167
Petitioner:
John Calvin Lacey, Jr.
Respondent:
Matthew Cate
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
