Cases 1 - 10 of 259
Erika Larae Williams v. Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med I
as 5:2024cv00767
Petitioner:
Erika Larae Williams
Respondent:
Warden of Victorville Camp FCI Med I
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lara, Jr. v. Eddy County Detention Center et al
as 2:2024cv00249
Petitioner:
Manuel G Lara, Jr.
Respondent:
Eddy County Detention Center and Attorney General State of New Mexico
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Jesus Lerma Jaras v. Brian Birkholz
as 2:2023cv09427
Petitioner:
Jesus Lerma Laras and Jesus Lerma Jaras
Respondent:
Brian Birkholz
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Lara v. Martinez
as 2:2023cv01199
Plaintiff:
Miguel Angel Lara
Defendant:
Felipe Martinez, Jr
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Lara v. Director, TDCJ
as 5:2023cv01058
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Lara, Sr.
Respondent:
-TDCJ Director and Bobby Lumkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Director, TDCJ
as 6:2023cv00421
Petitioner:
Joe Anthony Lara
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) Lara v. Pfeiffer
as 1:2023cv01176
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Lara
Respondent:
Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Pfeiffer
as 1:2023at00662
Petitioner:
Jose Luis Lara
Respondent:
Acting Warden Christian Pfeiffer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Lara v. Florida Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2023cv22604
Plaintiff:
Mario Albo Lara
Defendant:
Florida Department of Corrections and District Director, Immigration and Naturalization Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
