Cases 1 - 10 of 58
David v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02717
Petitioner:
Deonta David
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv02514
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 9:2024cv03114
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Honorable Alan Wilson, Donald J Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv01443
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddux and Melody M. Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith v. Maddox et al
as 1:2024cv01297
Petitioner:
Stephenson Lamar Smith
Respondent:
Melody M. Maddox, Chief's of Sheriffs office in Dekalb County, Tyrone Walker and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mills v. Maddox
as 1:2024cv00630
Petitioner:
Jimmy David Mills
Respondent:
Melody Maddox
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Young v. Wright et al.
as 1:2024cv00251
Petitioner:
Corvin Jauwan Young
Respondent:
Sheriff Chuck Wright, Alan Wilson, Donald J. Zelenka and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Melody v. Hill
as 3:2023cv06210
Defendant:
sean melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
v. Melody et al
as 3:2023mc80308
Defendant:
Sean Melody and Warden James Hill
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
CHEATHAM v. WINGFIELD et al
as 5:2023cv00278
Petitioner:
MELODIE CHEATHAM
Respondent:
A W WINGFIELD and MARIANNA FDC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
