General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 36
Mendy Read-Forbes v. K. Bennett
as 23-1775
Petitioner / Appellant: MENDY READ-FORBES
Respondent / Appellee: K. BENNETT, Warden
Read v. Warden, FCI Coleman Low We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2023cv00139
Petitioner: Loren David Read
Respondent: Warden, FCI Coleman Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
READING v. WARDEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2019cv00511
Petitioner: ANGELA MARGARET READING
Respondent: WARDEN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Read v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al(Hernando County)
as 8:2019cv01706
Petitioner: Walter A. Read
Respondent: Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reading v. Frauenheim We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 2:2017cv02171
Petitioner: Aaron Lafoy Reading
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Reading v. Frauenheim We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2017cv01424
Petitioner: Aaron Lafoy Reading
Respondent: Scott Frauenheim
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Read v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 17-10881
Petitioner - Appellant: DONALD W. READ
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Carver v. Raemish et al
as 1:2016cv02679
Petitioner: Readding L. Carver
Respondent: Rick Raemish and Cynthia H. Coffman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Donald Read v. Lorie Davis, Director
as 16-10656
Petitioner - Appellant: DONALD WAYNE READ
Respondent - Appellee: LORIE DAVIS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
ANTONETTY-RODRIGUEZ v. GIROUX
as 5:2016cv01930
Petitioner: JAVIER ANTONETTY-RODRIGUEZ
Respondent: NANCY GIROUX, THE DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF THE COUNTY OF BERKS and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF READING, PA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?