Cases 1 - 10 of 19
Roberto Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections, et al
as 23-11878
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ
Respondent / Appellee:
SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2023cv00066
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2022cv00585
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hernandez v. Secretary, Department of Corrections et al (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2020cv00293
Respondent:
Attorney General, State of Florida and Secretary, Department of Corrections
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Lopez #286815 v. Ryan et al
as 2:2015cv02474
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez Lopez
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Hernandez H. Roberto v. Victor Ville Herlong
as 3:2014cv01658
Plaintiff:
Roberto Hernandez Hernandez
Defendant:
Victor Ville Herlong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Roberto Hernandez Hernandez v. United States of America
as 2:2013cv08698
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez Hernandez
Respondent:
United States of America
Hernandez v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv01801
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Roberto Romero v. G. Lewi
as 13-55602
Petitioner - Appellant:
ROBERTO HERNANDEZ ROMERO
Respondent - Appellee:
G. D. LEWIS
Hernandez v. Akpore
as 1:2013cv02221
Petitioner:
Roberto Hernandez
Respondent:
Kevwe Akpore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
