General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Tony Ringer v. Michael Sheet
as 10-4522
Petitioner - Appellant: TONY RINGER
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden
Tony Ringer v. Michael Sheet
as 10-4495
Petitioner - Appellant: TONY RINGER
Respondent - Appellee: MICHAEL SHEETS, Warden
Rose v. Ringering We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2010cv00324
Petitioner: Shaun A Rose
Respondent: M Ringering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Rose v. Ringering
as 1:2010cv01105
Petitioner: Shaun A Rose
Respondent: M Ringering
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ringer v. Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
as 1:2009cv00788
Respondent: Warden, Warren Correctional Institution
Petitioner: Tony Ringer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherrick Ringer v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-10663
Petitioner - Appellant: SHERRICK DEWAYNE RINGER
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Sherrick Ringer v. Nathaniel Quarterman, Director
as 09-10382
Petitioner - Appellant: SHERRICK DEWAYNE RINGER
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Ringer v. Keffer et al
as 1:2008cv00890
Plaintiff: Lawrence Ringer
Defendant: Joe Keffer, USA, Bureau of Prisons and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ringer v. Federal Government et al
as 1:2007cv00593
Petitioner: Lawrence Ringer
Respondent: Federal Government, Scott Woodward, Stephen Knorr and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Ringer v. Quarterman We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 4:2007cv00501
Petitioner: Sherrick Dewayne Ringer
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?