Cases 1 - 10 of 148
Neal v. Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
as 1:2024cv00133
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Neal
Respondent:
Warden, Richland Correctional Institution
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2023cv02555
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Robinson v. Ashley County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2023cv01096
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Robinson
Respondent:
Ashley County Sheriff's Department and Ashley County Sheriff Office
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Robert Hackney v. John Davids
as 23-1869
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL HACKNEY
Respondent / Appellee:
JOHN DAVIDS, Warden
Robinson v. Doe
as 2:2023cv00169
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Robinson
Defendant:
Doe
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Lynn v. Myers
as 23-30432
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Earl Lynn
Respondent / Appellee:
Marcus Myers, Warden, Raymond Laborde Correctional Center
Robert Thomas v. Patrick Covello
as 23-15593
Petitioner / Appellant:
ROBERT EARL THOMAS
Respondent / Appellee:
PATRICK COVELLO
Thomas v. Secretary, Department of Corrections (Hillsborough County)
as 8:2023cv00748
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Thomas
Respondent:
Secretary, Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Toole v. United States of America
as 5:2023cv00223
Petitioner:
Robert Earl Toole
Respondent:
United States of America and Warden, FCC Coleman - Low
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Robert Leatherberry v. Jesse Pugh, Warden
as 23-1361
Petitioner / Appellant:
Robert Earl Leatherberry
Respondent / Appellee:
Jesse Pugh, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
