Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Everett v. Kelly
as 6:2020cv00070
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett
Respondent:
Brandon Kelly
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2019cv01366
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newton v. Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
as 3:2018cv02765
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Lorie Davis-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Newton v. William Stephens, Director, et al
as 15-10199
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD E. NEWTON, also known as Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION, In his individual capacity, in personam and STATE OF TEXAS, a Defacto Corporation, Fiction, Third Party
Newton v. Watkins et al
as 3:2013cv00817
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Craig Watkins, Russell Wilson, II, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Newton v. Watkins et al
as 1:2013cv00025
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett Newton
Respondent:
Craig Watkins, Russell Wilson, II, Brad Livingston and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 s Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Ronald Everett v. James Yate
as 11-57220
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD EVERETT
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES A. YATES, Warden
Everett v. Yates
as 1:2011cv00150
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett
Respondent:
James A. Yates
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Ronald Everett v. James A. Yates
as 2:2010cv06369
Petitioner:
Ronald Everett
Respondent:
James A. Yates
Ronald Newton v. Rick Thaler, Director
as 10-10757
Petitioner - Appellant:
RONALD EVERETT NEWTON
Respondent - Appellee:
RICK THALER, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
