Cases 1 - 10 of 70
Reese v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2024cv00801
Petitioner:
Reginald J. Reese, Jr.
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Fulcher v. State of Connecticut
as 3:2023cv00570
Petitioner:
Jahmal Fulcher
Respondent:
State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alicea v. United States of America
as 23-422
Petitioner / Appellant:
Maria Mercedes Alicea, for Ramon Octavio Alicea
Respondent / Appellee:
United States of America, State of Connecticut, Jane Doe, Judge Probate Court Westport Conneticut and others
Alicea v. USA et al
as 3:2023cv00170
Petitioner:
Maria Mercedes Alicea
Respondent:
United States Of America, State of Connecticut, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
PELLETIER v. STATE OF CONNECTICUT
as 1:2022cv00422
Petitioner:
ROLAND PELLETIER
Respondent:
STATE OF CONNECTICUT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Cook v. Martin
as 22-1873
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew Cook
Respondent / Appellee:
Martin, Warden and State of Connecticut
Cook v. Martin
as 22-1838
Petitioner / Appellant:
Andrew Cook
Respondent / Appellee:
Martin, Warden and State of Connecticut
Davalloo v. Kaplan
as 22-1646
Petitioner / Appellant:
Sheila Davalloo
Respondent / Appellee:
Sabina Kaplan, Superintendent, Bedford Hills Correctional Facility and George Jepsen, Attorney General of the State of Connecticut
Carolina v. Connecticut
as 22-1550
Petitioner / Appellant:
Tyrone Douglas Carolina
Respondent / Appellee:
State of Connecticut and Commissioner
Lopez v. Quiros et al
as 3:2022cv00565
Petitioner:
Ramon Lopez
Respondent:
Angel Quiros and State of Connecticut
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
