General Cases
Cases 1 - 10 of 99
Kamara v. Garland et al
as 1:2024cv00743
Respondent: Merrick B. Garland, Alejandro Mayorkas, Thomas Brophy and others
Petitioner: Mohamed Daramy Kamara
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mbunga v. Searls
as 6:2024cv06478
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Petitioner: Felly Nzau Mbunga
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Awuley v. Ball
as 6:2024cv06189
Petitioner: Prince Awuley
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls and Michael Ball
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Searles v. Baldauf
as 3:2023cv02394
Petitioner: Carolyn S. Searles
Respondent: Warden Teri Baldauf
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Castro-Almonte v. Searls
as 1:2023cv01160
Petitioner: Luis D. Castro-Almonte
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Saunders v. Searls
as 5:2023cv00326
Petitioner: Quantel Saunders
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
BOUIDIA v. GARLAND
as 3:2023cv00232
Petitioner: MOHAMED BOUIDIA
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL MERRICK GARLAND, ALEJANDRO MAYORKAS, JEFFREY SEARLS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Funt v. Searls
as 5:2023cv00305
Petitioner: Steven Funt
Respondent: Shelby Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Nkarakwi v. Searls
as 6:2023cv06456
Petitioner: Rodriech Nkarakwi
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Henries v. Searls We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2023cv00750
Petitioner: Edward Henries
Respondent: Jeffrey Searls
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?