Cases 91 - 100 of 376,254
Benavides v. Lujan-Grisham et al
as 1:2024cv00550
Plaintiff:
Eric Benavides
Defendant:
Michelle Lujan-Grisham, Alisha Tafoya, FNU Wilkens and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Blanford v. Wilkens et al
as 1:2024cv00551
Plaintiff:
Joe Blanford
Defendant:
FNU Wilkens, GCCF, Jacob LNU and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keraghan v. Tafoya
as 1:2024cv00552
Plaintiff:
Robert Keraghan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Harlan v. Tafoya et al
as 1:2024cv00553
Plaintiff:
Timothy Lavone Harlan
Defendant:
Alisha Tafoya and New Mexico Probation and Parole Board
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Demaris (PS) v. Colorado Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2024cv01553
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey Demaris
Defendant:
Colorado Department of Corrections, Core Civic Prison for Profit, LLC, Core Civic Chairman and President and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wolfe v. Streck
as 3:2024cv00164
Plaintiff:
Jason Wolfe
Defendant:
Rob Streck
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Byrd v. Woodburn et al
as 2:2024cv00122
Plaintiff:
Norman Lashan Byrd
Defendant:
Douglas Woodburn, Timothy Wade Burson, Ana Esteves and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Warren v. DPSCS et al
as 1:2024cv01594
Plaintiff:
Robert William Warren, Jr
Defendant:
DPSCS, JCI Warden, JCI Ast. Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. DOE et al
as 6:2024cv06347
Plaintiff:
Lumumba Woods
Defendant:
Superintendent JOHN DOE, Dep. Kelly, Dsp K VanNote and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Bannon v. K.C.P.C. et al
as 3:2024cv00331
Plaintiff:
Antonio Lee O'Bannon
Defendant:
K.C.P.C., Matthew Douglas and Ron Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
