Cases 11 - 20 of 36
Melendez v. City of New York et al
as 7:2012cv09241
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Probation, Vincint N. Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Melendez v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv09241
Plaintiff:
Michael Melendez
Defendant:
City of New York, New York City Department of Probation, Vincint N. Schiraldi and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kevin Hedgepeth v. C. Wilke
as 12-7086
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN EDWARD HEDGEPETH
Defendant - Appellee:
C. WILKES, police officer, ANDREW MURRAY, JOHN DOE and others
Carroll v. Virga, et al
as 2:2012cv01327
Plaintiff:
Tremaine Deon Carroll
Defendant:
Tim Virga, Matthew Cate, Department of Mental Health and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hedgepeth v. Wilkes et al
as 3:2012cv00262
Plaintiff:
Kevin Edward Hedgepeth
Defendant:
C. Wilkes, Andrew Murray, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Prisoner Civil Rights
David Rademaker v. A. Hedgepeth, et al
as 11-17223
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID RADEMAKER
Defendant - Appellee:
A. HEDGEPETH, Warden, R. MACK, M.D., L. FOX, R.N. and others
Gomez v. Hedgepeth et al
as 3:2011cv03784
Plaintiff:
David Maurice Gomez
Defendant:
A. Hedgepeth, Wilson, Gauch and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Michael Smith v. Arnold Schwarzeneggar, et al
as 11-15442
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LENOIR SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGAR, Governor, TILTON, Secretary, KERNAN, Director and others
Ware v. Hedgepeth et al
as 4:2010cv02865
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Ware
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgepeth and Ramone Haluche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ware v. Hedgepeth et al
as 2:2010cv01517
Plaintiff:
Michael Jason Ware
Defendant:
Anthony Hedgepeth and Ramone Haluche
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
