Cases 11 - 20 of 72
JOHNSON v. ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC et al
as 4:2022cv00167
Plaintiff:
GARY JOHNSON
Defendant:
ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES LLC and LEON COUNTY DETENTION FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kovacic v. Aramark Correctional Service LLC et al
as 1:2021cv02042
Plaintiff:
Holly Kovacic
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Service LLC, Warden Charmaine Bracy, Brandon Kohler and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Torres v. Helder et al
as 5:2020cv05194
Defendant:
Karas Medical Service, John and Jane Doe Employees of Karas, Sgt. Arnold and others
Plaintiff:
Justin Lee Torres
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Muhammad v. Wiles et al
as 3:2019cv00367
Defendant:
John Doe 1-125, Joanne Bernal, Aramark Services Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bilal Muhammad
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Young v. Aramark Correctional Service LLC et al
as 1:2019cv02823
Defendant:
Ryan James and Aramark Correctional Service LLC
Plaintiff:
Aaron E. Young
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
as 8:2019cv00468
Defendant:
Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Plaintiff:
Curtis Wayne Brown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Osorio v. Westchester County et al
as 1:2018cv05620
Plaintiff:
William A. Osorio
Defendant:
Westchester County, Aramark, Correctional Services, LLC, Francis Delgrosso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
English v. Aramark Corporation et al
as 4:2018cv01585
Plaintiff:
Jake Anthony English
Defendant:
Aramark Corporation and Aramark Correctional Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Mitchell v. Denton County Sheriff's Office et al
as 4:2018cv00343
Plaintiff:
Dustin Mitchell
Defendant:
Denton County Sheriff's Office, Aramark Correctional Services, LLC, FNU Rich and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Turner v. Henderson et al
as 4:2018cv01374
Plaintiff:
Raymond Turner
Defendant:
Rand Henderson, ARAMARK Correctional Services LLC and Ellis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
