Cases 11 - 20 of 25
Bennett et al v. Mays et al
as 3:2019cv00470
Defendant:
Brandon Watwood, Tony Mays, (f/n/u) Marbury and others
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson, Samuel Shaw, Corey Bennett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bennett et al v. Parker et al
as 3:2019cv00456
Plaintiff:
Pshawn Oliver, Donald Peoples, Walter Patrick and others
Defendant:
Tony Parker and Donna Turner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOHNSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI et al
as 1:2019cv01510
Defendant:
MISSISSIPPI DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, STATE OF MISSISSIPPI and WCCF SECURITY STAFF
Plaintiff:
BRANDON JOHNSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Johnson v. Utah Highway Patrol et al
as 2:2018cv00730
Defendant:
Brandon Davis, Anthony Carcubba, Brooke C. Wells and others
Plaintiff:
Deric Brandon Johnson
Undetermined:
Prisoner Litigation Unit and Correction Section (FYI)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Kenton County Detention Center et al
as 4:2018cv00228
Defendant:
Eibeck, Tromos, Kenton County Detention Center and others
Plaintiff:
Lamont Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Alabama Department of Corrections
as 2:2017cv01725
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Alabama Department of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson-Brown v. Dart
as 1:2017cv05633
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson-Brown
Defendant:
Thomas J. Dart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Moka et al
as 2:2017cv01657
Defendant:
Dir of NDOC and Moka
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brandon Johnson v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00794
Plaintiff:
The Undersigned Prisoners and Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Parole, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Lane
as 2:2015cv02260
Plaintiff:
Brandon Johnson
Defendant:
Lane
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
