Cases 11 - 20 of 25
John Banda, Jr. v. S. Adams, et al
as 16-1582
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN M. BANDA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
S. ADAMS, Unit Director (sued in her individual capacity), M. MAIN, Director (sued in his individual capacity), Y. CORNIEL, Program Coordinator & Treatment Team Member (sued in her Individual capacity) and others
Rodriguez v. Brown, et al.
as 1:2015cv01754
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Rodriguez
Defendant:
Edmund G. Brown, Jr., Kelly Harrington and Stuart Sherman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Conrad v. D. Rodriguez et al
as 2:2015cv04537
Plaintiff:
David Conrad
Defendant:
Federal Bureau of Prisons, Federal Correctional Complex Lompoc CA, Jack Fox and others
BANDA v. ADAMS et al
as 2:2015cv01887
Plaintiff:
JOHN BANDA
Defendant:
S. ADAMS, M. MAIN, Y. CORNIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Raines v. Monroe et al
as 2:2014cv00069
Plaintiff:
Dalawrence Raines
Defendant:
C. Monroe, F. Colver, D. Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Rodriguez
as 5:2013cv00441
Plaintiff:
Craig Johnson
Defendant:
Mark D. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Melvin Johnson v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2013cv00776
Plaintiff:
Melvin Johnson
Defendant:
D. Rodriguez, J. McAfee, Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation of California and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GUEVARA v. HOLLINGSWORTH et al
as 1:2013cv02950
Plaintiff:
JORGE GUEVARA
Defendant:
JORDAN R. HOLLINGSWORTH and D. RODRIGUEZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keith Darnell Denegal v. M Moz et al
as 2:2013cv02507
Plaintiff:
Keith Darnell Denegal
Defendant:
M Moz and D Rodriguez
Cotto-Garcia v. Administracion de Correccion et al
as 3:2013cv01054
Plaintiff:
Juan G. Cotto-Garcia
Defendant:
Administracion de Correccion and Javier D. Rodriguez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
