Cases 11 - 20 of 346
KING v. MASON et al
as 5:2023cv00344
Plaintiff:
EDDIE JAMES KING
Defendant:
JENNIFER MASON, DIXON and JOHN AND OR JANE DOE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BERRY v. SALES et al
as 5:2023cv00307
Plaintiff:
MARION BERRY
Defendant:
WARDEN TIMOTHY SALES and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PONDER v. DOES et al
as 5:2023cv00300
Plaintiff:
JEREMIAH D PONDER
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEPPERS v. DOES
as 1:2023cv00109
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Peppers
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jones-Williams v. Missouri State et al
as 4:2023cv00947
Defendant:
Beverly Barnett Parker, Missouri State, County of St. Louis and others
Plaintiff:
Rozina Rhonda Jones-Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Reed v. USP McCreary
as 6:2023cv00127
Petitioner:
Tony Reed
Respondent:
USP McCreary, Dr. Parsons, Dr. R. Jones and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lamar Casleberry v. David Ekwinife, et al
as 23-12384
Plaintiff / Appellant:
LAMAR DESHAWN CASLEBERRY
Defendant / Appellee:
DAVID EKWINIFE, BALDWIN SP WARDEN, DEPUTY WARDEN, BALDWIN STATE PRISON and others
MITCHELL v. SAMPSON et al
as 5:2023cv00214
Plaintiff:
KERRY S MITCHELL
Defendant:
WARDEN GREGORY SAMPSON, WARDEN CHARLES MIMMS, LIEUTENANT ROSEVELT GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
PEPPERS v. DOES
as 5:2023cv00262
Plaintiff:
JEREMY PEPPERS
Defendant:
JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BOYD v. RIVERBEND REH FAC ET
as 5:2023cv00211
Plaintiff:
DAVIOUS BOYD
Defendant:
RIVERBEND REH FAC ET and JOHN AND OR JANE DOES
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
