Cases 11 - 20 of 27
Timmons v. Kertes et al
as 1:2021cv02157
Plaintiff:
Brandon Timmons
Defendant:
H. Kertes, John Wetzel, Kevin Ransom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kokinda v. Foster et al
as 3:2021cv00154
Plaintiff:
Jason Steven Kokinda
Defendant:
Cprl. T.H. Foster, Ptlm. K.A. Shiflett, Cprl. S.P. Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDDINGS v. SHAPIRO et al
as 2:2021cv00999
Plaintiff:
KWAME T. EDDINGS
Defendant:
JOSH SHAPIRO, RICHARD BOWER and SEAN M. SAMSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
POPLAWSKI v. VILARINO et al
as 2:2021cv03084
Defendant:
JAYMMIE M. VILARINO, J.M. POPLAWSKI, HON. JOSH SHAPIRO and others
Plaintiff:
RICHARD A. POPLAWSKI
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Blake et al
as 4:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Jonathan M Blake, Keli M. Neary and Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. Blake et al
as 1:2021cv00512
Defendant:
Jonathan M Blake, Keli M. Neary and Josh Shapiro
Plaintiff:
Ronald S. Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
EDWARDS v. STOKES et al
as 2:2021cv01222
Defendant:
JENNIFER O. ANDRESS, JOHN WETZEL, DANIEL P. ALVA and others
Plaintiff:
NICHOLAS EDWARDS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Isaac v. Marsh et al
as 1:2020cv01993
Defendant:
Z.N. Hammers, Major Curtis Grice, Josh Shapiro and others
Plaintiff:
Derek Isaac
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jackson v. Helfrich et al
as 3:2020cv00399
Defendant:
Officer Troy Cromer, York County Police Department, Alisa Litavidis and others
Plaintiff:
Franklin Jackson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SAULTZ v. COMMONWEALTH OF PENNSYLVANIA OFFICE OF ATTORNEY GENERAL. JOSH SHAPIRO ATTORNEY GENERAL et al
as 5:2019cv05778
Defendant:
ATTORNEY GENERAL JOSH SHAPIRO, OFFICER DAWN HEUSER, BADGE #439, SPECIAL AGENT ERIC J. BARLOW and others
Plaintiff:
ROBERT ANDREW SAULTZ
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
