Cases 11 - 20 of 40
Williams v. Walmart Inc. et al
as 0:2018cv60384
Plaintiff:
Ronald M. Williams
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., J. Harrison, Michael J. Satz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Williams v. J Harrison, et al
as 17-11017
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD MAURICE WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
J HARRISON, Margate Police Department, GLORIA DAFOUR, Assistant Manager of Wal-Mart, ALVIN GRACEY, U.S. Security Service Security Guard and others
Williams v. Harrison et al
as 0:2016cv62279
Plaintiff:
Ronald Maurice Williams
Defendant:
J. Harrison, Gloria Dafour, Alvin Gracey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. Maiben et al
as 1:2016cv00253
Plaintiff:
Ronald Vincent Williams
Defendant:
Willie Maiben, Travis W. Grant, Jill Phillips and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Williams v. McDowell et al
as 3:2016cv00338
Defendant:
Kryen Brown, Jane Doe, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Earl Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. SIEREVELD et al
as 2:2016cv00032
Defendant:
V. RIGSBY, KATHERINE SIEREVELD, CLINT SWIFT and others
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. RIGSBY
as 2:2016cv00030
Defendant:
RIGSBY
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. SIMMONS et al
as 2:2015cv00380
Defendant:
D. EZEKIEL and J. SIMMONS
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
WILLIAMS v. LYNCH et al
as 1:2015cv01814
Plaintiff:
RONALD EDWARD WILLIAMS
Defendant:
LORETTA LYNCH and CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ronald Williams v. Joseph Nish, et al
as 15-1143
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD C. WILLIAMS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOSEPH P. NISH, Former Superintendent, KAREN ROGERS-SWEENEY, Program Coordinator, WAYNE GAVIN, Superintendent and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
