Cases 21 - 30 of 687
Busby v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
as 5:2023cv01102
Plaintiff:
Jeremy Ladon Busby
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Grimes v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00406
Plaintiff:
John A Grimes
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, State of Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Unknown Holman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Dodd v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00117
Plaintiff:
Roger Lavoy Dodd
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hogan v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 6:2023cv00336
Plaintiff:
Danny Hogen and Danny Hogan
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Officer Unknown Unknown, Officer Ashton Unknown and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mason v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2023cv00111
Petitioner:
Deondray Raymond Mason
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 9:2023cv00103
Petitioner:
Robert Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Caldwell v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 1:2023cv00249
Petitioner:
Robert Caldwell
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Director, TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv01368
Plaintiff:
Kevin Jerome Jones
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ-CID, R Bowers, NFN Wonders and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jaramillo v. Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID et al
as 3:2023cv00181
Plaintiff:
Luis Ray Jaramillo, Jr
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin-Director TDCJ-CID, Michael A Collum, Derek Light and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Caudillo
as 23-10572
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jacob James Kelly
Defendant / Appellee:
Olivia Caudillo, David Dyer, Cody Parker and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
