Cases 31 - 40 of 47
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-17032
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Walter Rodenhurst, III v. Kay Bauman, et al
as 11-16669
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WALTER V. RODENHURST, III
Defendant - Appellee:
KAY BAUMAN, M.D., KENNETH ZIENKIEWICZ, M.D., FRANK J. LOPEZ and others
Michael Victory v. Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 11-16187
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, Governor, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Tepong v. Murphy et al
as 3:2010cv02656
Plaintiff:
Lor Tepong
Defendant:
Michael P Murphy, S.A. Nezezon, D Cadden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gray v. Rodriguez et al
as 1:2010cv00874
Defendant:
Mrs. Felts, Mr. Maynard, Mr. R.D. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Derrick Gray
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
HARPER v. MALONE
as 1:2010cv00032
Plaintiff:
ELTON D. HARPER
Defendant:
R.D. MALONE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Michael Victory v. Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger, et al
as 09-17613
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL VICTORY
Defendant - Appellee:
GOVERNOR ARNOLD SCHWARZENEGGER, JEANNE WOODFORD, Director of Corrections, JAMES A. YATES, Warden and others
Gordeau v. Miller et al
as 4:2009cv03753
Plaintiff:
Joshua Gordeau
Defendant:
R.D. Miller, CE Lane, DW Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goodeau v. Miller et al
as 4:2009cv03700
Plaintiff:
Joshua Goodeau
Defendant:
R.D. Miller, C.E. Lane, D.W. Sutton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Woods v. Cashier's N. Sterlingnl MCI et al
as 3:2008cv01948
Plaintiff:
Jeffery A. Woods
Defendant:
Cashier's N. Sterlingnl MCI, Terry J. Collins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
