Cases 31 - 40 of 474
Jackson v. Lumpkin et al
as 5:2024cv00020
Plaintiff:
Reidie James Jackson
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin, Michael Britt, Paige Temple and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Clemons v. Lumpkin
as 24-20032
Plaintiff:
John Henry Clemons, III
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Rocky Moore, Patrick O'Daniel and others
Burke v. Lumpkin
as 4:2024cv00527
Petitioner:
Andrew Burke
Respondent:
Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dillard v. Davis
as 24-10006
Plaintiff:
Daniel D. Dillard
Defendant:
Lorie Davis, Former Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Jimmy S. Smith, Senior Warden, Elbert G. Holmes, Former Assistant Warden and others
Garza v. C.O. Ms. Flores et al
as 3:2024cv00007
Plaintiff:
Rogelio Garza
Defendant:
C.O. Ms. Flores, Larissa Wysocki, Beens Shah and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dudley et al v. Lopez et al
as 5:2023cv00291
Plaintiff:
Antonio Dudley, Carl Jones, Christian Ojeda and others
Defendant:
John Lopez, J. Back and Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Zurovetz v. Collier et al
as 5:2023cv00296
Plaintiff:
Todd Michael Zurovetz and Todd Micheal Zurovetz
Defendant:
Brian Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, B Harbour and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phillips v. Lumpkin et al
as 2:2023cv00185
Plaintiff:
Marvin Dale Phillips
Defendant:
Bobby Lumpkin, Dr NFN Risko, Maria D Carrizales and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Strong v. Collier et al
as 2:2023cv00308
Plaintiff:
Tabari S. Strong
Defendant:
Byran Collier, Bobby Lumpkin, Adrian Amonett and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thomas v. Morton et al
as 2:2023cv00311
Plaintiff:
Jewell Thomas
Defendant:
Dr. Gary Morton, Sr. Warden Adrian Amonett, Dr. Lanette Linthicum and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
