Cases 31 - 40 of 688
Norris v. Franklin et al
as 3:2023cv02114
Plaintiff:
Donald E Norris
Defendant:
Keith Franklin, Williamson County Sheriff and Williamson County Court House
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Chau v. Norris et al
as 8:2023cv01273
Defendant:
Detective Jonathan Norris, Blake and Detective Richard Curry, Jr.
Plaintiff:
Cuong Man Chau
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Norris v. United States
as 5:2023cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tyquil C. Norris, III
Defendant:
United States and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Tort Action
Keedy v. l/n/u et al
as 3:2023cv00558
Plaintiff:
Joshua W. Keedy
Defendant:
Mary l/n/u, Shawn Vanwinkle, Sharron Norris and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lemus Berrios v. Gouff et al
as 1:2023cv01297
Plaintiff:
Osbaldo Lemus Berrios
Defendant:
Brian Gouff, Kenneth Hardman, Ms. Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert v. Hillhouse
as 23-40268
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Dewayne Robert
Defendant / Appellee:
Botie Hillhouse, Travis Lyan, Ashley Rader and others
Ray Heid, et al v. Gary Mohr, et al
as 23-3367
Plaintiff / Appellant:
RAY SCOTT HEID and JAMES E. DAMRON
Defendant / Appellee:
GARY C. MOHR, Director, ROGER WILSON, Chief Inspector, TREVOR CLARK, Individually and others
Rhodes v. Shannon, et al
as 23-8026
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MARTY W. RHODES
Defendant / Appellee:
DANIEL SHANNON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Director, EDDIE WILSON, Wyoming Department of Corrections Prison Administrator, SETH NORRIS, Wyoming Department of Corrections State Penitentiary Deputy Warden and others
Norris Williams v. DOJ
as 23-5082
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Norris Williams
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice
Johnson v. Giles, et al
as 23-1096
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant / Appellee:
GILES, TONCHIE, CARPENTER and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
