Cases 31 - 40 of 192
SMART v. LEITH et al
as 1:2022cv01814
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH and COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMART v. EYNON et al
as 1:2022cv01751
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
LINDA EYNON, WARDEN MATTHEW LEITH and COUNTY OF BURLINGTON BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Goldman et al v. Judd et al
as 8:2022cv00549
Plaintiff:
Adam Goldman, Joshua M. Shaw, Charles Johnson and others
Defendant:
Grady Judd, Howard L. Dimmig, II, Ita M. Neymotin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pease v. SunTrust Bank et al
as 8:2021cv02949
Plaintiff:
Darien Jerode Pease, Sr.
Defendant:
SunTrust Bank, Johnnie L. Smart and Jen Marie Dejesus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lobato v. San Juan County Detention Center
as 1:2021cv01041
Petitioner:
Marcellus Lobato
Respondent:
USA
Defendant:
San Juan County Detention Center, FNU Smart and FNU Reuchount
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kibbey v. Collin County Detention Facility et al
as 4:2021cv00799
Plaintiff:
Brian Allen Kibbey
Defendant:
Collin County Detention Facility, Officer FNU Keo, Officer FNU Munn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Lee County Sheriff's Office
as 2:2021cv00709
Plaintiff:
Hendre J. Smart
Defendant:
Lee County Sheriff's Office
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Woodley v. Boost Mobile et al
as 3:2021cv02241
Plaintiff:
George William Woodley, Jr
Defendant:
Boost Mobile and Cube Smart
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sparrow v. Grove et al
as 1:2021cv00165
Defendant:
Jefferson County Correctional Facility, David E Grove and Smart Communications
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sparrow
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS-BEY v. SMART et al
as 2:2021cv01578
Defendant:
SMART and SARPONG
Plaintiff:
TYRONE LEWIS-BEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
