Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Jose Herrera-Cubias v. John Fox, et al
as 14-15429
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOSE HERRERA-CUBIAS
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN B. FOX, JOSEPH E. KEFFER, MICHAEL W. GARRETT and others
James Higgs v. Stafford Easterling, et al
as 13-6374
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JAMES CARL HIGGS
Defendant - Appellee:
STAFFORD EASTERLING, Attorney, LADONNA THOMPSON, Commissioner, COOKIE CREWS, Warden, Warden and others
Countryman v. City of Aurora et al
as 1:2013cv02466
Plaintiff:
Brian L. Countryman
Defendant:
City of Aurora, Township of Naperville, County of DuPage and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIPPOLITO v. THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
as 1:2013cv00175
Plaintiff:
FRANK DIPPOLITO
Defendant:
THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, ERIC HOLDER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Thibodeaux v. Hazelwood
as 6:2012cv00670
Plaintiff:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Defendant:
Robert Hazelwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dietz v. Hayes et al
as 6:2012cv02010
Plaintiff:
Bruce Dietz
Defendant:
Wesley Hayes, Iberia Parish Jail, Richard Hazelwood and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thibodeaux v. Contreal et al
as 6:2012cv00362
Plaintiff:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Defendant:
James Contreal and Robert Hazelwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Backstrom v. Thayler et al
as 2:2012cv00116
Plaintiff:
Steven Michael Backstrom
Defendant:
Rick Thayler, John H Adams, Stewart Williams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Thibodeaux v. Contreal et al
as 6:2012cv00049
Plaintiff:
Paul Dewayne Thibodeaux
Defendant:
James Contreal and Robert Hazelwood
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Higgs v. Easterling et al
as 3:2011cv00499
Plaintiff:
James Carl Higgs
Defendant:
Stafford Easterling, LaDonna Thompson, Cookie Crews and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
