Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Lewis v. Texas Department of Criminal Justice et al
as 6:2016cv00108
Defendant:
Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, Texas Correctional Industries and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harnage v. Torres et al
as 3:2015cv01843
Plaintiff:
James A. Harnage
Defendant:
Raquel Torres, Anthony Coletti, Jodi M. Rell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 1:2015cv01054
Plaintiff:
James Hairston
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hairston v. Schofield et al
as 3:2015cv00134
Plaintiff:
James Hairston
Defendant:
Derrick Schofield, Jason Woodard, Alicia Cox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ortiz et al v. Juaquine Pope et al.
as 4:2014cv02985
Defendant:
Tracy Bailey, Brad Livingston, Juaquine Pope and others
Plaintiff:
John Doe and Prison Justice League
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. United States of America
as 3:2013cv00731
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Glenn v. Milling et al
as 3:2011cv01029
Plaintiff:
Donald Glenn
Defendant:
Lynn Milling, Rich Peracho, Cruickshank and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
David Scott v. Bernadette Stone, et al
as 11-1003
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DAVID J. SCOTT
Defendant - Appellee:
BERNADETTE STONE, MICHAEL LEWIS, JAN BIGELOW and others
Lewis v. Fenoglio et al
as 3:2010cv00566
Plaintiff:
Michael Lewis
Defendant:
James S Fenoglio, C Brooks, Phillip Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Director TDCJ-CIO et al
as 6:2010cv00118
Plaintiff:
Henry Michael Lewis
Defendant:
Director TDCJ-CIO, John A Rupert, Eddie D Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
