Cases 41 - 50 of 150
Adams v. Gonzales et al
as 4:2021cv03148
Plaintiff:
Nathan Brent Adams
Defendant:
Sheriff Ed Gonzales, Harris County Sheriff's Office, Major Thomas Diaz and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HARRIS-EVANS v. LOCKETT et al
as 5:2021cv00331
Plaintiff:
JAVANTE HARRIS-EVANS
Defendant:
CERT OFFICER LOCKETT and CERT OFFICER WILLIAMS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dumond v. Miami Dade Police Department
as 1:2021cv22918
Plaintiff:
Daniel Dumond
Defendant:
Miami Dade Police Department, K-9 Bone and Officer William Arrowsmith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gutierrez v. City of Odessa Police Department, et al
as 7:2021cv00118
Defendant:
City of Odessa Police Department, Officer William McCloud and Officer FNU Gryder
Plaintiff:
Mark A. Gutierrez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tawe v. AKA John Doe et al
as 4:2021cv01789
Defendant:
L. Thompson, T. Brock, H. Klawinsky and others
Plaintiff:
Richard Ngeh Tawe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HENDERSON v. MERCER et al
as 7:2021cv00053
Defendant:
ASHLEY MOODY, DONALD BRYANT, JUDGE W LOUIS SANDS and others
Plaintiff:
KEITH HENDERSON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WHITE v. DOUGHERTY COUNTY JAIL et al
as 1:2021cv00014
Defendant:
D O DEAN, NURSE SHEPHERD, PHOEBE PUTNEY HOSPITAL and others
Plaintiff:
GEORGE WASHINGTON WHITE, JR
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garrett v. Commonwealth of Virginia et al
as 3:2020cv00986
Defendant:
A. David Robinson, Steve Herrick, Officer Williams and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis J. Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Mathis v. Mayo et al
as 3:2020cv00783
Defendant:
Officer William Mayo and Officer Curt Flynn
Plaintiff:
Danel T. Mathis, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Helgeson v. Stoner et al
as 0:2020cv62346
Defendant:
Officer Ervins Hyppolite, Judge Susan Alspector, Officer Thomas Bickman and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Quinn Helgeson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
