Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Shakur Gannaway v. Prime Care Medical Inc, et al
as 16-1019
Plaintiff - Appellant:
SHAKUR D. GANNAWAY
Defendant - Appellee:
CAMP HILL SCI, LIZHONG, ADAPT INC, etc al, William Tillman and others
Smith v. Prime Care Medical Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv15050
Plaintiff:
John Mack Smith
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc., Western Regional Jail Medical C.O.s and Nurse Staff and Psychiatrist Doctors and Medical Staff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Neill v. Prime Care Medical Inc. et al
as 3:2015cv02039
Plaintiff:
Jorge L. Arroyo O'Neill
Defendant:
Prime Care Medical Inc. , Debborah Wilson , Patty Buntin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Momo v. Sable et al
as 3:2015cv01665
Plaintiff:
Joseph Momo
Defendant:
Mary Sable, Izzirrary, John Doe No. 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ballenger v. Crawford et al
as 3:2015cv12558
Plaintiff:
William Ballenger
Defendant:
Larry Crawford , John Doe, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts v. Wilson et al
as 3:2015cv01607
Plaintiff:
Keith Alan Roberts
Defendant:
Debborah Wilson, Patty Bunting, Jackie Gregory and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SPRINGS v. PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC. et al
as 2:2015cv02684
Plaintiff:
CODY SPRINGS
Defendant:
PRIME CARE MEDICAL, INC., WEXFORD HEALTH SOURCES, INC., CORRECT CARE SOLUTIONS, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barnes v. Wartz et al
as 1:2015cv00667
Plaintiff:
Tony S. Barnes
Defendant:
Pam Wartz, Prime Care Medical Inc., Marc Massuci and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Beers et al v. Northumberland County et al
as 1:2014cv02349
Plaintiff:
Sherry Beers and Andrew Beers
Defendant:
Northumberland County, Northumberland County Prison and Prime Care Medical, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Cumberland County Prison et al
as 3:2014cv01091
Plaintiff:
Rendell Jones
Defendant:
Cumberland County Prison and Prime Care Medical Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
