Cases 41 - 50 of 215
O'Connor v. Backman et al
as 3:2018cv01423
Defendant:
Hon. Paul Backman, Michael J. Satz, S. Johnson and others
Plaintiff:
Nyka O'Connor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bogues v. Bishop et al
as 1:2018cv03642
Defendant:
Ofc. Rounds, B. Cornachia, Warden Frank Bishop and others
Plaintiff:
Ericky Bogues
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Johnson v. State of Florida, et al
as 5:2018cv00572
Defendant:
State Of Florida and North Florida Evaluation and Treatment Center
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richardson v. United States of America et al
as 5:2018cv00763
Defendant:
K Orange, Bureau of Prisons, Kassidy Burchette and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Keith Richardson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Charles Johnson v. Elijha Prusinski, et al
as 18-13169
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES S. JOHNSON
Defendant - Appellee:
ELIJHA SERRANO PRUSINSKI, Marion County Sheriff's Department - Deputy Sheriff, JONATHAN COLEMAN, Marion County Sheriff's Department - Deputy Sheriff and MARION COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT
Johnson v State of Florida et al
as 5:2018cv00385
Defendant:
State Of Florida, Shanae L. Harris and Dr. Harry Krop
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Prusinski et al
as 5:2018cv00135
Plaintiff:
Charles S. Johnson
Defendant:
Elijha Serrano Prusinski and Jonathan Coleman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Andre Revis v. E. Jarvis, et al
as 18-15415
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANDRE L. REVIS
Defendant - Appellee:
E. JARVIS, K. CRIBBS, C. BARNET and others
Jones v. Alsobrook et al
as 5:2018cv00042
Plaintiff:
Cedric Anthony Jones
Defendant:
Michael S Alsobrook, Tony G Rust, Michael S Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oliver v. Calderon et al
as 6:2017cv01792
Plaintiff:
Warren Oliver
Defendant:
Dr. Calderon, Ms. Papp, Warden Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
