Cases 41 - 50 of 247
Thomas v. The State of Alabama et al (INMATE 1)
as 1:2020cv00010
Defendant:
Houston County Court and The State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Dwight Thomas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Martin v. State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles (INMATE 1)
as 2:2019cv01061
Defendant:
State of Alabama Board of Pardons and Paroles
Plaintiff:
Clarence Martin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barber v. State of Oregon et al
as 3:2019cv01631
Defendant:
Hon. Judge Simon, Attorney General of North Carolina, Attorney General of West Virginia and others
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Barber
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McCoy v. Monroe County Sheriff's Department et al
as 1:2019cv00581
Plaintiff:
Lamar McCoy
Defendant:
Monroe County Sheriff's Department, Alabama Department of Corrections and State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ingle v. Anthony et al
as 2:2019cv01049
Defendant:
Spencer, State of Alabama Pardon and Parole Board and John Anthony
Plaintiff:
Wendy Crocker Ingle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gibson v. State of Alabama
as 5:2019cv01051
Plaintiff:
Antonio James Gibson
Defendant:
State of Alabama
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Richburg v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 1:2019cv01035
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn, State of Alabama Department of Corrections, Cpt. Howard and others
Plaintiff:
Randy J. Richburg
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cruise v. Brooks
as 1:2019cv00256
Defendant:
Benjamin H. Brooks, III and State of Alabama
Plaintiff:
Harold David Cruise
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Irvin v. State of Alabama Department of Corrections et al
as 5:2019cv00720
Defendant:
Jefferson Dunn and State of Alabama Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
George Eugene Irvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Arnold v. State of Alabama et al (INMATE 2)
as 1:2019cv00636
Plaintiff:
Derrick Arnold
Defendant:
State of Alabama, Andrew Mark Skier, Talladega County Circuit Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
