Cases 41 - 50 of 177
Eazelle v. Poling et al
as 2:2018cv00471
Defendant:
James Poling, Dr. William Forgey, City of Crown Point and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Eazelle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Devine v. Neal et al
as 3:2018cv00995
Defendant:
Timothy Redden, Ron Neal, J. Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Barbara Devine
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilson v. Lake County Sheriff's Department et al
as 2:2018cv00461
Plaintiff:
Napoleon Wilson
Defendant:
Dr. William Forgey, Edward Davies, John Buncich and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Perez, Jr. v. Forgey et al
as 2:2018cv00295
Defendant:
Correctional Health Indiana, Inc., William Forgey, M.D., Unknown Employees of Lake County Jail and others
Plaintiff:
Frank Perez, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Simpkins v. Cobb et al
as 3:2018cv00961
Defendant:
Chad Lee, Capt Taylor, Kevin W Cobb and others
Plaintiff:
Curtis Ray Simpkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Clark v. Pecan Haven Addiction Recovery Center et al
as 3:2018cv00930
Defendant:
Amy Gilliand, Pecan Haven Addiction Recovery Center, Stanley Neatherly and others
Plaintiff:
Rusty Clark
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carmen v. Buncich et al
as 2:2018cv00227
Plaintiff:
Irvin Carmen
Defendant:
John Buncich, Edward Davies, William Forgey and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Byam v. Cain et al
as 2:2018cv01030
Defendant:
C/O Barba, B. Cain, Capps and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Jonathan Byam
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ABDUR-RAHEEM v. LANIGAN et al
as 3:2018cv10390
Plaintiff:
SHAMSIDDIN ABDUR-RAHEEM
Defendant:
GARY M. LANIGAN, JOHN FALVEY, LINDA SANTORO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brennan et al v. Kelly et al
as 2:2018cv00079
Plaintiff:
Kyle L. Brennan , Patrick D. Church and Brian L. Iles
Defendant:
Emma C. Kelly , Charles Kelly , Mary Ann Kelly and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
