Cases 51 - 60 of 1,635
Duncan v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05659
Plaintiff:
Shanell K Duncan
Defendant:
Pierce County, Alvin R Allen, Maria Martin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03186
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Roberson v. Hickman et al
as 2:2023cv01423
Plaintiff:
Clarence Lonnell Roberson
Defendant:
J. Hickman, K. Staley, J. Feltner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Barnes v. Tulsa Police Department et al
as 4:2023cv00288
Defendant:
B Keener, J Faircloth, Tulsa Police Department and others
Plaintiff:
Dario Perez Barnes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Han v. Pierce County et al
as 3:2023cv05613
Plaintiff:
Seung Han
Defendant:
Pierce County, Patti Jackson and Ed Troyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Taylor v. Colburn et al
as 5:2023cv03155
Plaintiff:
Cameron Michael Taylor
Defendant:
Richard Colburn and Ricklin Pierce
Interested Party:
Finney County Sheriff
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Starkgraf v. White et al
as 3:2023cv05593
Plaintiff:
Kristopher S Starkgraf
Defendant:
White, Pierce County Sheriffs Department, Place and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McClain v. Chisolm et al
as 1:2023cv00860
Plaintiff:
Spencer R McClain
Defendant:
John Chisolm, Eric Bashirian, Steven Strasser and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Talley v. Harry et al
as 1:2023cv01033
Plaintiff:
Quintez Talley
Defendant:
Dr. Laurel Harry, MHM, Inc., Pennsylvania Department of Corrections and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shipley v. Pierce
as 1:2023cv02768
Plaintiff:
Lorenzo Lamar Shipley
Defendant:
Travis Pierce
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
