Cases 51 - 60 of 423
Stamps v. Rollins et al
as 8:2017cv00830
Plaintiff:
Rupert Stamps
Defendant:
Leroy Rollins and Paris Capalupo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Michael Lane v. John Rupert, et al
as 17-40253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL LANE
Defendant - Appellee:
JOHN A. RUPERT, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Warden, LARRY S. DOLYE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden, JEFF CATOE, Individually & in his/her official capacity as Assistant Warden and others
Frankie Polk v. William Stephens, et al
as 17-40234
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FRANKIE POLK
Defendant - Appellee:
WILLIAM STEPHENS, TINA STAPLES, HANNA MARSHALL, also known as Hannah Marshall and others
Hand v. Rupert et al
as 6:2017cv00111
Plaintiff:
Brandon Elias Hand
Defendant:
John A Rupert, Jane Doe, Kaylee L Hillhouse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Garza v. Richy et al
as 6:2017cv00080
Plaintiff:
Rosfel Garza
Defendant:
Linda Richy, Bill Pierce, John Rupert and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Freddie Fountain v. Rick Thaler, et al
as 17-40135
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDDIE FOUNTAIN
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN A. RUPERT, LARRY G. DOYLE, PAM PACE and others
Carl Hunt v. Sarah Pierson, et al
as 17-40127
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL ELMON HUNT
Defendant - Appellee:
SARAH PIERSON, Medical Provider, PAMELA PACE, Practice Manager, University of Texas Medical Branch, JOHN DOE, University of Texas Medical Branch Director and others
Cash v. Rupert et al
as 6:2017cv00049
Plaintiff:
Calvin Ray Cash
Defendant:
John Rupert and Pamela Pace
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Donis Denby v. Bosco, et al
as 17-40074
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DONIS LEMOND DENBY
Defendant - Appellee:
FNU BOSCO, Warden, FNU HUNT, Correction Officer, FNU RUPERT, Warden and others
Brooks v. Bell et al
as 6:2017cv00018
Plaintiff:
Charles David Brooks
Defendant:
Oliver J Bell, Brad Livingston, Kelvin Scott and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
