Cases 51 - 57 of 57
Gomis v. United States Of America et al
as 5:2008cv02276
Plaintiff:
Antoine Gomis
Defendant:
United States Of America, United States Department of State, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
AMADI V. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ET AL.,
as 1:2008cv00111
Plaintiff:
OKECHUKWU MUMMEE AMADI
Defendant:
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, MICHAEL CHERTOFF, IMMIGRATION AND CUSTOMS ENFORCEMENT and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Sex Discrimination
Horester v. U.S. Department of Homeland Security et al
as 4:2008cv00016
Plaintiff:
Brian W. Horester
Defendant:
U.S. Department of Homeland Security, Luzerne County Correctional Facility and Clinton County Correctional Facility
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Awala v. Mukasey et al
as 1:2007cv03231
Plaintiff:
Gbeke Michael Awala
Defendant:
Michael B. Mukasey, Colm F. Connolly and U.S. Department of Homeland Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Ruiz v. Supreme Court County of Queens et al
as 1:2007cv05823
Plaintiff:
Richardo Joe Ruiz
Defendant:
Supreme Court County of Queens, Queens District Attorney's Office, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ruiz v. El Paso Processing Center et al
as 3:2007cv00204
Plaintiff:
Martin Moreno Ruiz
Defendant:
El Paso Processing Center, El Paso Processing Center, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James Kaufman v. Michael Mukasey
as 06-5259
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James J. Kaufman
Defendant - Appellee:
Michael B. Mukasey, Attorney General, Michael Chertoff, Secretary, U.S. Department of Homeland Security and Condoleezza Rice, Secretary, U.S. Department of State
Amicus Curiae For Appellant:
Steven Harris Goldblatt
:
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
