Cases 61 - 70 of 244
Chambers v. Ebbert et al
as 3:2018cv01009
Plaintiff:
Roscoe Chambers
Defendant:
David J. Ebbert, M.D. Carvajol, Colbert and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bartlett v. Columbia County et al
as 3:2018cv00807
Plaintiff:
Christopher Bartlett
Defendant:
Columbia County, Ryan Dews, Jeffrey M. Dickerson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Yelizarov v. Moyer
as 1:2018cv01353
Plaintiff:
Stanislav Yelizarov
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Sisson, Ward and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Escobar v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv00983
Plaintiff:
Edwin Bladimir Escobar
Defendant:
Stephen T. Moyer, Dayena Corcoron, Ricky Foxwell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maurice Moyer, Sr. v. People of the State of Califor, et al
as 18-55361
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MAURICE D. MOYER, Sr.
Defendant - Appellee:
PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, JOSEPH P. BRANNIGAN, Honorable Judge and SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, D.A.
Chauncey Demetrius Bennett v. Warden John Wolfe
as 18-6226
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHAUNCEY DEMETRIUS BENNETT
Defendant - Appellee:
WARDEN JOHN WOLFE, LIBRARIAN JUNE BRITTINGHAM, L.T. VANESSA JONES and others
Williams v. Moyer et al
as 1:2018cv00363
Plaintiff:
Scotland Williams
Defendant:
Stephen Moyer, Dayena Corcoran, Frank Bishop and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McBride v. Warden et al
as 1:2018cv00171
Plaintiff:
Amy McBride
Defendant:
Warden, Larry Hogan and Stephen Moyer
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Glasper v. Murray et al
as 1:2018cv00068
Plaintiff:
Ernest D. Glasper
Defendant:
Murray, Andrew Edinger and Moyer
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Anthony Kelly v. Stephen Moyer
as 18-6000
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ANTHONY QUENTIN KELLY
Defendant - Appellee:
STEPHEN T. MOYER, Secretary of Maryland Department of Public Safety and Correctional Services, STATE OF MARYLAND, FRANK B. BISHOP, Warden and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
