Cases 61 - 70 of 192
Smart v. Worcester County Detention Center
as 8:2019cv00217
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F. Smart
Defendant:
Worcester County Detention Center
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Hawkins v. Smart et al
as 5:2019cv00077
Defendant:
Mekisha Smith Creal, Office of District Public Defender, Micheal Enright and others
Plaintiff:
Larry Cardell Hawkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. BORO OF SOMERDALE et al
as 1:2019cv00044
Defendant:
PATROLMAN S. BRYANT, POLICE CHIEF JOHN DOE, TASHA ALI and others
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC. et al
as 1:2018cv17684
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY BOARD OF CHOSEN FREEHOLDERS, GLOBAL TELECOMMUNICATIONS, INC., DAVID OWENS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smart v. Queen Anne's County et al
as 8:2018cv04023
Plaintiff:
Salahuddin F. Smart
Defendant:
Queen Anne's County and John Doee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
SMART v. QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY et al
as 1:2018cv17434
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
JOHN DOE FOOD SERVICES PROVIDER, QUEEN ANNE'S COUNTY, WARDEN JOHN DOE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Kyttle v. Smart et al
as 2:2018cv02052
Defendant:
David Pirritano, Kenneth L. Joiner, Alice K. Matin and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Kyttle
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SMART v. DALTON et al
as 1:2018cv17049
Plaintiff:
SALAHUDDIN F. SMART
Defendant:
CAMDEN COUNTY PROSECUTORS OFFICE, OFFICE OF THE PUBLIC DEFENDER CAMDEN REGION, TIMOTHY DALTON, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Emerick et al
as 1:2018cv03043
Defendant:
Russell, Dick, John Doe and others
Plaintiff:
Jabari Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Copeland v. Jones et al
as 1:2018cv24940
Plaintiff:
Shannon Copeland
Defendant:
Director Christopher Wray, U.S. Attorney General, Katherine Fernandez-Rundle and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
