Cases 1 - 10 of 83
Crump v. Ohio Casualty Insurance Company et al
as 3:2023cv00824
Plaintiff:
Ramar Dion Benjamin Crump
Defendant:
Ohio Casualty Insurance Company, Geoffrey Anderson, Bentrell Blocker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Meyers v. Reidinger et al
as 3:2023cv00812
Defendant:
David Meyers, Martin Reidinger, Graham Mullen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Seamon v. Barnes et al
as 5:2023ct03098
Plaintiff:
George Seamon
Defendant:
FNU Barnes, FNU Mullins, John Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Barnes et al
as 5:2022cv00185
Plaintiff:
Tony Timothy Martin
Defendant:
J.T. Barnes, John Does and Chris Bowman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Martin v. Locklear et al
as 5:2022ct03162
Plaintiff:
Javis Martin
Defendant:
Mary Locklear, Lt. Odom, Correctional Officer Locklear and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DeCory v. Anderson et al
as 5:2022ct03152
Plaintiff:
William M.A. DeCory and William Martin Ardene DeCory
Defendant:
D. Anderson, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Department of Justice and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shreve v. Stephenson et al
as 5:2022cv00163
Plaintiff:
Kimberly Shreve
Defendant:
B M Stephenson, B. Jones, Officer Howell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Watson v. Thomas et al
as 5:2022ct03132
Plaintiff:
Darius Watson
Defendant:
Charlie Thomas, Martin Wasielewski, Rebecca Brigman and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DIAMOND v. ODEDERE
as 1:2022cv00287
Plaintiff:
MARTIN RUSSELL DIAMOND
Defendant:
ODEDERE, EUOTE, CRISCO and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
