Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Alexander Cameron v. T. Ellis, III
as 23-6645
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
T. S. ELLIS, III, District Court Judge, JAMES C. CLARK, Circuit Court Judge, BRYAN PORTER, Commonwealth Attorney and others
Cameron v. Ellis III et al
as 1:2023cv00714
Petitioner:
Alexander Cameron
Respondent:
T.S. Ellis III, Circuit Court for the City of Alexandria, United States District Judge Patricia Tolliver Giles and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Cameron v. Ellis et al
as 1:2022cv01218
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
T. E. Ellis, James C. Clark, Ryan Porter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Alexander Cameron v. W. Newberry
as 22-6544
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant / Appellee:
W. NEWBERRY, Dentist, J. BURRELL, Dental Assistant and J. GORMUS, Dental Assistant
Cameron v. Newberry et al
as 1:2022cv00329
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
W. Newberry, J. Burrell and J. Gormus
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Bivens Prisoner
Cameron v. Moore et al
as 1:2021cv00463
Defendant:
Becky J. Moore, Myron T. Scholberg, James C. Clark and others
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Alexander Cameron v. Alfred D.Swersky
as 14-6503
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ALEXANDER CAMERON
Defendant - Appellee:
ALFRED D. SWERSKY, Judge, JOHN KLOCH, Prosecutor, BECKY J. MOORE and others
Cameron v. Swersky et al
as 1:2014cv00179
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
Alfred D. Swersky, John Kloch, Becky J. Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Perin et al
as 1:2011cv00718
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
V. Perin, Don L. Bartlett, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cameron v. Sutton, et al.
as 1:2011cv00717
Plaintiff:
Alexander Cameron
Defendant:
Kevin Sutton, Sheila Hughes, Eddie L. Pearson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
