Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Michael Piskanin, Jr. v. District Attorney Lehigh Count, et al
as 12-2666
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MICHAEL JOHN PISKANIN, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
DISTRICT ATTORNEY LEHIGH COUNTY, KELLY L. BANACH, ARLEN SPECTER and others
Piskanin v. Martin et al
as 1:2012cv00908
Plaintiff:
Michael John Piskanin, Jr.
Defendant:
James B Martin, Kelly L. Banach, Arlen Specter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Frederick Banks v. Sager, et al
as 11-2153
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
SAGER, Ft. Dix, R & D Officer, R&D DEPT, FORT DIX FCI and others
Frederick Banks v. A. Whitaker, et al
as 11-2125
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK H. BANKS
Defendant - Appellee:
A WHITAKER, Teacher, J TENOR, Education Supervisor, B STEELE, Teacher and others
Banks v. Sager et al
as 1:2011cv00741
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
S. Sager, R & D Department, Fort Dix, NJ CFCIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Banks v. Whitaker et al
as 1:2011cv00669
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
A. Whitaker, Stevens, J. Tenor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Cannon v. Biden et al
as 0:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Joseph R. Biden, Jr., Arlen Specter, Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cannon v. Biden et al
as 1:2009cv00178
Plaintiff:
Tyrrall Farrow Cannon
Defendant:
Joseph R Biden, Jr, Arlen Specter, Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dumonde, Daniel v. Cong US, et al
as 08-5008
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Daniel Lafitte Dumonde
Defendant - Appellee:
Congress of the United States, Artur Davis, Rep., Darlene Drew, Warden and others
DUMONDE v. CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES et al
as 1:2007cv02123
Plaintiff:
DANIEL LAFITTE DUMONDE
Defendant:
CONGRESS OF THE UNITED STATES, ARTUR DAVIS, DARLENE DREW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
