Cases 1 - 9 of 9
ANDERSON v. WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT
as 1:2023cv00264
Plaintiff:
ALBERT MARQUAVIOUSLAMAR ANDERSON
Defendant:
WINSTON SALEM POLICE DEPARTMENT, BOBBY F. KIMBROUGH, CATRINA AMELIA THOMPSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Elizabeth Carley v. Romeo Aranus, et al
as 23-15271
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ELIZABETH CARLEY
Defendant / Appellant:
ROMEO ARANUS
Defendant:
NEVEN, Warden, GENTRY, Warden, DZURENDA, Director and others
JOHNSON v. CLARKE
as 1:2021cv00121
Plaintiff:
JAMIEL JOHNSON
Defendant:
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER B.B. CLARKE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Stevens v. Gentry et al
as 2:2015cv01002
Defendant:
Romeo Aranan, B.B. Clark, Cox and others
Plaintiff:
Sherrie Stevens
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Iacovangelo v. Correctional Medical Care, Incorporated et al
as 6:2013cv06466
Plaintiff:
Frank B. Iacovangelo
Defendant:
Correctional Medical Care, Inc., Emre Umar, Registered Nurse T.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jerrod Booth v. Maricopa County, et al
as 09-15794
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
MARICOPA COUNTY, JOE ARPAIO, Sheriff, TIMOTHY OVERTON, Jail Commander and others
Jerrod Booth v. Joe Arpaio, et al
as 09-15793
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
JOE ARPAIO, Maricpa County Sheriff, TIMOTHY OVERTON, Jail Commander at 4th Ave. Jail, JOHN DOE, Legal Support Specialist and others
Jerrod Booth v. City of Glendale, et al
as 09-15795
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF GLENDALE, RANDY G. ADAMS, Chief of Police, City of Glendale, JOHN DOE, Supervisor at City of Glendale Police Dept. and others
Jerrod Booth v. City of Phoenix, et al
as 09-15792
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JERROD LEN B.B. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF PHOENIX, JACK HARRIS, John Doe Police Chief at City of Phoenix, MIGUEL DURAN, Police Officer at City of Phoenix and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
