Cases 1 - 10 of 1,759
Bennett
as 7:2024cv00123
Plaintiff:
Brian Bennett
Defendant:
John Doe 7:24-cv-00123-O
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. The Kroger Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01666
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Defendant:
Food For Less Store Manager and The Kroger Co.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Penwell v. Washington State Department of Corrections et al
as 3:2024cv05748
Defendant:
Cheryl Strange, Krissy Rygg, Eric Jackson and others
Plaintiff:
Tony Penwell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Diaz v. Bennett et al
as 1:2024cv06823
Defendant:
Anthony J. Annucci, Morrow and Stacy Bennett
Plaintiff:
Pedro Diaz
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. FBI Dickson et al
as 1:2024cv03946
Defendant:
Croford, Brian Dickerson, FBI Dickson and others
Plaintiff:
Danny Ray Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Food 4 Less et al
as 3:2024cv01561
Defendant:
The Kroger Co. and Food 4 Less
Plaintiff:
John Bennett Smith, Jr
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Mottley v. Rock et al
as 3:2024cv02046
Plaintiff:
Skylar Mottley and Devin Mottley
Defendant:
John Doe, Anthony Jones, Latoya Hughes and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Greene v. Villars et al
as 3:2024cv01403
Defendant:
Lt. Buchard, Christopher Scarr, Larry Bennett and others
Plaintiff:
Shane V. M. Greene
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Georgia Department of Corrections
as 1:2024cv00143
Defendant:
Georgia Department of Corrections
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bennett v. Disciplinary Report Board et al
as 1:2024cv00144
Defendant:
Lt. Dyke and Disciplinary Report Board
Plaintiff:
Danny Bennett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
