Cases 1 - 10 of 13
Bailey v Williams et al
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Jamie Bailey
Defendant:
Tiffany Williams, Logan Edwards, Tony Parker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Parks v. Boyd et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
Bruce Parks, Jr.
Defendant:
Bert Boyd, A.W. Cobble, Cutter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rice v. Northeast Correctional Complex et al
as 2:2020cv00016
Defendant:
Roger Bailey, C/O f/n/u Brock, Bert Boyd and others
Plaintiff:
Jacob Rice
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00474
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Tennessee Correction Academy, Treatment Correction Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. R. Lewis et al
as 1:2016cv24875
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
R. Lewis, Bert Boyd, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. R. Lewis et al
as 0:2016cv62771
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
R. Lewis, Bert Boyd, Darren Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 1:2016cv00422
Plaintiff:
Thomas Daniel Eugene Hale
Defendant:
Tennessee State of, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 5:2016cv00117
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Tennessee Correction Academy, Treatment Correction Academy and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hale v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2016cv00159
Plaintiff:
Thomas D. Hale
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Bert Boyd, Darren L. Settles and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Randall Turner v. Derrick Schofield, et al
as 16-5513
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RANDALL TURNER
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRICK D. SCHOFIELD, Commissioner, JASON WOODALL, Deputy Commissioner, DOUG COOK, Warden, BCCX and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
