Cases 1 - 10 of 11
Hubbard v. Oxford Police Department et al
as 5:2018cv00786
Plaintiff:
Gregory Markelle Hubbard
Defendant:
Oxford Police Department, John L. Friend, Andrew S. Miller and others
Miscellaneou:
staff attorney 2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones, Jr. v. IDOC et al
as 3:2015cv01198
Plaintiff:
Louis T. Jones, Jr.
Defendant:
IDOC, Big Muddy River Correctional Center, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 2:2015cv04065
Plaintiff:
Curtis Jerome Brown, Sr
Defendant:
United States of America, US Probation Dept, US District Court and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Willie Asbury v. David Tartarsky
as 14-6731
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE J. ASBURY, a/k/a Sa'id Abdullah Al'Rashid
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TARTARSKY, DON DRISKELL, JOETTE D. SCARBOROUGH and others
Defendant:
JOHN KINARD, JAMES R. BARBER, III, JOSEPH R. MCCROREY and others
Willie Asbury v. John Kinard
as 14-6639
Plaintiff - Appellant:
WILLIE J. ASBURY, a/k/a Sa'id Abdullah Al'Rashid
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID TARTARSKY, DON DRISKELL, JOETTE D. SCARBOROUGH and others
John Baccus v. Bristow Marchant
as 14-6517
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN ROOSEVELT BACCUS
Defendant - Appellee:
BRISTOW MARCHANT and DAVID C. NORTON
Baccus v. Marchant et al
as 9:2013cv03439
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Bristow Marchant and David C Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baccus v. Marchant et al
as 8:2013cv03439
Plaintiff:
John Roosevelt Baccus
Defendant:
Bristow Marchant and David C Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Brown v. Norton
as 8:2009cv01628
Plaintiff:
Curtis J Brown, Sr
Defendant:
David C Norton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights, State Filers
Lewis v. Norton
as 1:2009cv00330
Petitioner:
William Clifton Lewis
Respondent:
D. C. Norton
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
